Maids and colors and styles, oh my!


Labels: bridesmaids dresses, Miss Chevy Chase
Ah planning a wedding. Venture with planner Vicky Johnson and her "Nearly-Wed" band of brides, through the ever glamorous, vitally important, detail oriented process of orchestrating the most important day in a woman's life (or at least it seems that way at the time) all while attempting to maintain some decorum and have a great time. These are the DC Nearlyweds!!
Labels: bridesmaids dresses, Miss Chevy Chase
Labels: Miss Chevy Chase, Photography
Location | Date | Local Time | Description |
---|---|---|---|
GREENSBORO , NC , US | 08/17/2009 | 1:06 P.M. | ARRIVAL SCAN |
LOUISVILLE , KY , US | 08/17/2009 | 3:02 A.M. | DEPARTURE SCAN |
LOUISVILLE , KY , US | 08/14/2009 | 11:07 P.M. | ARRIVAL SCAN |
08/14/2009 | 10:56 P.M. | DEPARTURE SCAN | |
08/14/2009 | 7:04 P.M. | ORIGIN SCAN | |
US | 08/13/2009 | 8:54 P.M. | BILLING INFORMATION RECEIVED |
Tracking results provided by UPS: 08/17/2009 4:19 P.M. ET
They were printed and shipped much faster than I had expected, but all weekend they just sat in Louisville!!! Now they are so close (Greensboro is less than an hour from me) but I won't get them until tomorrow according to UPS. Maybe they'll be delivered by mid-morning, in which case I can look at them on my way back to lab from an off-campus meeting. Cross your fingers everyone!
I'm really excited because the STDs are the first concrete "thing" since my e-ring. The prospect of sending them out and officially publicizing the date make it all seem so much more real. Unlike my dress, which I've ordered but won't receive until next year some time, or the flowers which I won't see until wedding day, or the invitations which are a blur of ideas in my head, the STDs are complete (yay, I can finally check something off my to-do list. Almost.) and I will have them in hand by tomorrow. I just hope I didn't make some major typo that none of my proofers caught.
What one event/item made your marriage seem more of a reality, and less of a far-off dream? Was there something that made it hit home?
Labels: Miss Chevy Chase, Save the Dates
Labels: Miss Chevy Chase, Save the Dates
Labels: Miss Chevy Chase
I have decided to try to teach myself calligraphy, or at the very least, to write neatly enough to address my own invitations. Overly ambitious? Maybe. A useless skill that I’ll never use again after my wedding? Hopefully not. A fun challenge? Definitely!
I had thought about taking a calligraphy course at the local tech college, but then I saw Miss Star’s post on weddingbee, and she inspired me to order this book from Amazon:
It came in the mail on Tuesday, and I was so excited to start learning that all I could think about yesterday was getting out of work so I could rush to Michael’s to buy nibs and paper. I purchased this cheap starter kit and some parchment with a 20% off coupon that I tore out of one of my bride magazines:
I also plan to watch some of the lessons on the IAMPETH website (International Association of Master Penmen, Engrossers, and Teachers of Handwriting; they have guide sheets you can print out too) and to recruit help from a friend who has taken a calligraphy class.
I have 310 days until my wedding, so I plan to have invitations ready for mailing in 220 days. I figure I have about 100 invitations to address, so if I can perfect my skills and design my invites in the next 120 days, then I only have to do one envelope/day – now that doesn’t sound so bad, does it?
I’ll keep you all updated on my progress over the coming weeks and will entertain you with before and after pictures – let’s hope you can tell the difference!
Who else has tried to learn calligraphy or another skill for her wedding?
Labels: calligraphy, Miss Chevy Chase
In preparation for sending out my STDs, I’ve been collecting addresses, filling out spreadsheets, trying to decide how to address my guests, and reading Miss Woodley Park’s post on calligraphy. And I’m wondering just how much traditional etiquette really matters.
For example – since I don’t intend to pay for calligraphy (there goes etiquette right there!), do I need to hand-write the addresses, or can I print them? Do I need inner envelopes? If I do use inner envelopes, do I have to refer to my married doctor friends as “The Doctors Doe,” or can I use “John and Jane”? The latter feels more personal to me, while the former feels pretentious. I don’t think I want people at my wedding who are offended that I addressed them by first name on a formal envelope. But then, maybe my friends will be touched by a bit of formality in an otherwise casual, abbreviated written world. (Idk what 2 do!)
For the last few weeks, I’ve had this plan in my head (I haven’t shared it with anyone, even Mr. CC – it’s been fairly abstract): use formal etiquette on the outer envelope. Instead of an inner envelope, use a label on a belly band or pocket fold (invitations are not yet designed) and address my guests casually, by first name or nickname. That way, I can make clear who is invited (+/- guest) without wasting paper/$/postage on an inner envelope. But then yesterday, a recently-married friend directed me to this guide (a very helpful resource!), published by a calligrapher, which suggests that guests always appreciate the formal touch:
“A RECENT TREND: Using just first names on inner envelopes: “Sally and Tom.” What’s up with this? This is the equivalent of wearing your running shoes with your elegant wedding gown. An inner envelope, in and of itself, indicates a formal event and calls for traditional wording. I’ve worked with brides who claim that addressing the inner envelopes with “Ms. Johnson” instead of “Sarah” sounds stuffy. Let me reassure you: when your recipients open a traditionally addressed invitation, they will not think of you as stuffy at all! They will feel special and value your good taste. VERY IMPORTANT: Traditional addressing reflects the formality of the EVENT – not the level of formality of a friendship.”
Hmm … that comment was basically directed right at me … I know that I can forgo the etiquette and ignore this woman’s experience and advice, but do I want to?
Labels: etiquette, Miss Chevy Chase
Labels: Miss Chevy Chase, Save the Dates
I apologize for the long delay since Part I. I've been busy the past few weeks and spending every free moment in the evenings catching up on the day’s Wimbledon matches.
So, a quick recap: We had penciled in a date at the National Museum of Women in the Arts – a gorgeous marble hall. But, it was expensive and we didn’t have a good option for the ceremony, other than having it at the museum. So, when we finally got engaged 4 months after wehad stopped our venue search, we opened it up again.
We had initially rejected any sites that required a tent because we didn’t want to worry about it being too hot/cold, since May weather in DC can be unpredictable. But I had always imagined that I would have an outdodor wedding, and all of a sudden, we couldn’t figure out why we’d refused to consider venues with tents.
After extensive online research, we came up with two places: George Washington’s River Farm in Alexandria, and Woodend Nature Sanctuary in Chevy Chase.
The River Farm has an amazing setting on the banks of the Potomac, with a wildflower meadow and large lawns. There’s a tented patio in the back of the house, right off the ballroom. Of course, I saw the place in February just after the snow melted, but it was still pretty and didn’t take much imagination to realize how stunning it would be come spring.
Woodend has a similar setup, with a tented patio off the ballroom. I liked how at Woodend, the patio and ballroom are connected by french doors that enable the space to feel more continuous. The patio was also a little bit bigger than at the River Farm. For the ceremony, there are a few outdoor options. Most people hold their ceremony in the grove – a flat grassy area surrounded by hemlock trees. If it’s been raining, another option is the south lawn, which is elevated a bit and has better drainage. If it rains and we have to have the ceremony in the tent, we’d hold it facing the south lawn so that our guests are looking out at the woods. So, we were happy with the different options. For the cocktail hour, there’s a covered portico where we can set up a bar so that guests can enjoy the outdoor evening and maybe even spot some deer (I saw one when I was checking out the place!).
In the end, we went with Woodend, both because it felt “right” to us, and because the River Farm no longer had our date available. There are lots of hotel options in Bethesda (all of which are metro accessible), and we’re close to the city, where many of our guests live. We are really happy that we reconsidered our venue to find a place that was more “us” – not a formal ballroom but a beautiful setting where we can bring in our own style through flowers and décor.
How have you all let your venue reflect who you are as a couple?
Labels: Miss Chevy Chase, venues
Hi everyone! It’s time to introduce yet another new DC nearlywed.
A quick about-me: I am 27, grew up in Arlington, went to college in Boston, took time off to travel in South East Asia, China, Australia, New Zealand, and Fiji, then started a MD/PhD joint degree program at UNC-Chapel Hill. I’m 4 years into my program and have 4 to go (yikes!). I’m currently doing psychopharmacology research to get my PhD in pharmacology. I speak French and love everything french; play on several soccer teams; and love food, wine, and travel (especially to France).
My fiancé and I met in the fall of 2005 when we started medical school at UNC together. Although we were in the same small social medicine class, neither of us had any interest in the other, and apparently he actually thought I was “kind of awful.” By chance, in January 2006 we sat next to each other at a UNC men’s basketball game against Davidson, his alma mater. Since we were rooting for different teams, we started a little friendly banter, chatted throughout the whole game, and arranged to attend the next game together. He must have decided I wasn’t so bad after all, because within a week we were inseparable.
He proposed this past February, after three years together. We had picked out the diamond and chosen the setting together, so it wasn’t a surprise at all (I had figured out the exact day he was going to propose), but it was sweet. He bought me flowers (which our cats ate before he could give them to me) and made me dinner, importantly followed by Godiva chocolate cheesecake!
Our wedding will be May 22, 2010 at Woodend Sanctuary in Chevy Chase (hence the pseudonym). That’s 348 days from now! We are planning the wedding with the help of my mom and sister/MOH/corporate event planner, both of whom are in the DC area. Since we have plenty of time to pull it all together, it’s been fun … so far. I’m sure the stress will come later! To date, we’ve booked venue, caterer, photographer, and band. We’ve also met with a few florists. I found my dress in North Carolina, which will make fittings much easier than having them done in DC. And that’s as far as we’ve gotten. Up next is a wedding website and STDs. I’ve been teaching myself to use Adobe Illustrator so that I can design these. I had thought I’d be a very hands-off bride and would let my mom and sister take the reins, but that’s definitely not been the case. Planning is much more fun that I had thought! I’ve become blog-obsessed (and I never read blogs before the engagement) so I’m happy to be able to start contributing to one!
Labels: Miss Chevy Chase